<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andrew Hillman Blog - Latest Comments in Starbucks after dark is a really bad idea</title><link>http://andrewhillman.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://andrewhillman.disqus.com/starbucks_after_dark_is_a_really_bad_idea/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:41:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Starbucks after dark is a really bad idea</title><link>http://ahillman.com/marketing/starbucks-after-dark-is-a-really-bad-idea/#comment-3559261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My father and I heard  about the promo while listening to the radio and we both thought it sounded like trouble.  Of course, my father is an attorney so this is why I assumed this. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:41:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starbucks after dark is a really bad idea</title><link>http://ahillman.com/marketing/starbucks-after-dark-is-a-really-bad-idea/#comment-3549633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"(I believe this promotion is illegal since it could violate laws because it specifically targeted voters.)"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It may have been. At some point in the day Starbucks (and everyone else giving away free stuff) announced that &lt;i&gt;anyone&lt;/i&gt;, voter or not, was eligible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Thompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:03:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>